
How about make Mad Max 2?
Well on the plus side, the retirement age will probably be 90 by then, so you'll get a couple more in...Wrathbone wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 1:56 pmI think I would loathe Fallout by Larian, not least because as fun as BG3 can be, it is basically Divinity: Original Sin 3 with a D&D skin. Larian Fallout would be full of radioactive surfaces everywhere, radioactive barrels that explode to create more radioactive surfaces, radioactive arrows... I'm getting angry even contemplating it.![]()
Saying that, a new isometric Fallout would be a really great change after 3/4/Vegas. I do think Bethesda need to outsource Fallout because their development speed is simply too slow to keep up with Elder Scrolls, Fallout and now Starfield (assuming they want to make it a new series). At the current rate, I'll have probably retired before Fallout 6 is released. That's not even an exaggeration: if we generously say that Fallout 5 comes out in 2030, that's a 15 year gap since Fallout 4, so another 15 years after that would be 2045 for Fallout 6, by which time I'll be 60.![]()
I like 3 and NV about the same, but I think the reason people fawn over NV is that it has quests with far more complex branching and possibilities than in 3. The main quest is incredibly fluid in that regard, so your choices do impact the outcome of the game far more than in 3.Alan wrote: ↑Wed Jun 15, 2022 2:10 pmI do agree but if it were between a Fallout Original Sin and another Bethesda style one that’s no choice at all. I only ever managed to finish 3 and that was a slog. I feel I should try NV again since people rave about it but it really didn’t seem much different. Was NV just better written?