Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
It hit the spot for me, although they did mess it up a little bit:
Spoiler
All told though they nailed it. Reacher the 6'5" monster delivering crushing beat-downs and being a supreme bad-ass investigator came through way better than with the half-pint cultist in the starring role. They told the story well and faithfully and I will be there for my next seasons gluttony just as soon as they can get it filmed.08/10/2003 - 17/08/2018RCHD wrote:Snowy is my favourite. He's a metal God.
10501

Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Yup, I'm still onboard with anything else they produce.
I think I have a small mancrush on the lead bloke. I've never seen him before but thought he acted it all quite well with some emotional range. (I've since looked him up and he's been in some marvel type stuff)
The female cop was also cute
I think I have a small mancrush on the lead bloke. I've never seen him before but thought he acted it all quite well with some emotional range. (I've since looked him up and he's been in some marvel type stuff)
The female cop was also cute

-- To be completed at some point --
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
For me the biggest thing is that they followed the story from the book. It seems a strange thing to need to comment on but having watched the train wreck that was Wheel of Time, and to a fair degree The Witcher...
08/10/2003 - 17/08/2018RCHD wrote:Snowy is my favourite. He's a metal God.
10501

Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Incidentally, I just read that Hamill's voice in that episode was done entirely digitally:Wrathbone wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 8:19 amThe Book of Boba Fett
It's a weird state of affairs when a show about Boba Fett is best when Boba Fett takes no real part in it. I've really enjoyed the last two episodes, but that's because they're The Mandalorian season 2.5. Spoilers for the latest episode:
Spoiler
Which probably accounts for it sounding off.Luke 2.0’s voice is entirely digital, the result of a sophisticated “neural network” that learned Hamill’s voice from old Star Wars dialogue and even a vintage audiobook.
I have a Youtube channel now! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6kVsr ... Q/featured
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
That’s such a weird choice. Why not just get someone who can do a reasonable impersonation? Maybe even digitally alter their performance? No doubt they spent such an obscene amount of money on it that they couldn’t justify not using the terrible robotic monstrosity they’d produced.
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
The people in charge of Star Wars seem pretty keen on not recasting any character they can reasonably fake digitally, and if they're spending the money on it now then it's only going to improve. Luke's voice was pretty flat, but I'd say it was convincing (to the point we thought it was manipulation of Hamill delivering those lines), and that lack of energy arguably isn't *too* big of a problem when he's doing his Jedi mentoring.
I really don't think we're that far away from breaking out of the uncanny valley with this stuff. Whether that's a good thing or not is certainly worth discussion.
I really don't think we're that far away from breaking out of the uncanny valley with this stuff. Whether that's a good thing or not is certainly worth discussion.
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Visually I think they've nailed it - certainly still room for improvement, but Luke essentially looks real. I'm not at all convinced by the voice yet though, as it lacked any performance. Like I said before, it's not that it sounds unlike Mark Hamill, it's all in the delivery (i.e. there wasn't one).
Whether it's a good thing... I think like all digital tech used in films and TV, it should be treated as a tool, not the default. If it can be used to achieve something otherwise not possible then it's fair enough. In this case I fully agree with their choice to use a visually digital Luke, especially as it's the face superimposed on a human actor, which helps take it out of the uncanny valley. I think there were few good reasons to do an AI voice, though. Also, I'm not sure I agree with the calls from some people to cast Sebastian Stan as Luke, partly because I don't rate him much as an actor and partly because they tried that with Han and Lando in Solo and I found it really distracting. Re-casting is always a risky and delicate thing to get right, not least when you're dealing with characters and actors that are iconic.
Whether it's a good thing... I think like all digital tech used in films and TV, it should be treated as a tool, not the default. If it can be used to achieve something otherwise not possible then it's fair enough. In this case I fully agree with their choice to use a visually digital Luke, especially as it's the face superimposed on a human actor, which helps take it out of the uncanny valley. I think there were few good reasons to do an AI voice, though. Also, I'm not sure I agree with the calls from some people to cast Sebastian Stan as Luke, partly because I don't rate him much as an actor and partly because they tried that with Han and Lando in Solo and I found it really distracting. Re-casting is always a risky and delicate thing to get right, not least when you're dealing with characters and actors that are iconic.
- Animalmother
- Local
- Posts: 4020
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2018 3:44 pm
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Watched the first 2 episodes of Reacher. I know nothing about the character or the books so truth be told I'm not overly blown away by it so far. I think it might be the lead actor who I'm not feeling it for, he's a bit wooden in the performance. Also the little self satisfied smile he has after explaining something to one of the other characters irks me. I'll give it a couple more episodes to see if I'll stick with it.
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Just finished Season 5 of The Expanse, and goodness the finale delivered a series of gut-punches. I was in bits watching the death of a major character, then looking up afterwards and finding out why he was written out made me feel very let down. The showrunners did a good job given the circumstances.
I have a Youtube channel now! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6kVsr ... Q/featured
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
It was... alright. Under the circumstances they probably did the best they could, but the party scene does feel a little off with no mention of the event. I went into it knowing that the actor had left the series, but not the circumstances surrounding it. I think it's literally my only criticism of the show, but it's not something they had any real control over.
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Yeah, apparently everything came to light after filming had wrapped, so they were quite limited with what they could do via editing and reshooting a scene (without that actor). The party scene apparently had to be CGId to remove the actor, hence why his death wasn't mentioned in it! It was better for him to go out on-camera rather than have something happen off-screen between seasons, which was probably their only real alternative.Raid wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:56 pmIt was... alright. Under the circumstances they probably did the best they could, but the party scene does feel a little off with no mention of the event. I went into it knowing that the actor had left the series, but not the circumstances surrounding it. I think it's literally my only criticism of the show, but it's not something they had any real control over.
I have a Youtube channel now! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6kVsr ... Q/featured
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Yeah, I know that resuming a production the size of The Expanse (Adam Savage did a lot of interviews for his Tested Youtube channel with production and cast members a few years ago when he made his cameo at the end of season 2, and there are a hell of a lot of people involved with shooting, costuming, continuity etc.) wouldn't have really been possible to shoot just one or two extra shots.
I know there's a re-shot scene beforehand that deals with it, but at the party everyone is smiling and it's a bit of a tonal shift. It's entirely forgivable in the circumstances, it just feels a bit wrong.
I know there's a re-shot scene beforehand that deals with it, but at the party everyone is smiling and it's a bit of a tonal shift. It's entirely forgivable in the circumstances, it just feels a bit wrong.
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Spoiler tags please AlanSly Boots wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:36 pmJust finished Season 5 of The Expanse, and goodness the finale delivered a series of gut-punches. I was in bits watching the death of a major character, then looking up afterwards and finding out why he was written out made me feel very let down. The showrunners did a good job given the circumstances.

08/10/2003 - 17/08/2018RCHD wrote:Snowy is my favourite. He's a metal God.
10501

Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
Lol I did avoid any specifics, and to be honest they adopt the Game of Thrones approach to major characters throughout, and the ending of that character was only the latest surprise in a series of them.Snowy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 5:44 pmSpoiler tags please AlanSly Boots wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:36 pmJust finished Season 5 of The Expanse, and goodness the finale delivered a series of gut-punches. I was in bits watching the death of a major character, then looking up afterwards and finding out why he was written out made me feel very let down. The showrunners did a good job given the circumstances.![]()
I have a Youtube channel now! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6kVsr ... Q/featured
Re: Good TV (aka, the TV series spamthread), the second series
If it's of any consolation, when you see the context you'll perhaps understand why it doesn't feel like much of a spoiler.