(mini-rant time, I apologise in advance)
I find it incredibly frustrating that for the last few years we've been given extensive witness testimony (some under oath) and corroborating evidence that the US and likely other nations are well aware of a non-human intelligence interacting with us. David Grusch was the watershed moment for me, but others have since come forward and pushed the topic forward in ways I never expected. Just listen to Colonel Karl Nell speaking plainly about it:
And the public at large still don't think there's anything to it at all. I expect there are some eyes rolling at me talking about it here, but to those who have been following it closely in recent years it's not so much a question of "if" anymore, but "what". Joe public and mainstream science simply aren't interested though.
But then a bunch of scientists say they're pretty certain there's alien life on a planet based on some gas signatures (which by their own insistence wouldn't even constitute conclusive proof), and the public are quite happy to accept that and nod along without any substantial understanding of what that means. People of high credibility and credentials, including world-renowned scientists like Gary Nolan, have been telling us that NHI are here, not 120 light years away, not based on gas data but on actual retrieved materials, and they're not worth listening to? It's dismaying.
I trust in science - clearly that is the way to determine factual information. But the outright dismissal of overwhelmingly strong avenues of research by mainstream science and the public, primarily because that research won't get funded, is holding us back. So yes, finding strong signs of life on a distant planet is a major scientific step, but to me it feels like more of a soft confirmation of what I'm already confident is a much more local reality.
This is the one thing Carl Sagan ever said publicly that I disagree with. Extraordinary claims require evidence - the magnificence of the evidence is irrelevant. Evidence is evidence."extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"